Forty-four per cent: reading the nausea figure properly
Trial adverse-event tables count episodes reported to a study nurse. They are the best data we have and they systematically under-record the mundane.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Everything filed in April 2024, the month of Volume 1, Number 4. The issue itself — cover, editor’s letter and table of contents — is here.
Trial adverse-event tables count episodes reported to a study nurse. They are the best data we have and they systematically under-record the mundane.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Degradation rates rise exponentially with temperature while an arithmetic mean adds linearly. Mean kinetic temperature is the weighting that reconciles the two, and it is…
A peptide has a monoisotopic mass and an average mass, they differ by several daltons at this molecular size, and a certificate that does not say which it quotes cannot be…
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
A reminder that a purity figure is the output of a method, and that methods differ.
The evidence on stopping is better than the evidence on almost anything else in this field, because somebody deliberately randomised it.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
We work through a single chromatogram twice, under two integration conventions, and show where the difference comes from.
Cost is the modal reason for discontinuation in every dataset we have seen, and it is absent from the clinical literature.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A single drug producing both constipation and diarrhoea looks contradictory until the motility data is read properly.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
We asked twenty companies three questions about stability data and print every answer, refusal and non-response.
A drug that delays gastric emptying complicates the assumption behind every fasting instruction in perioperative medicine. The professional bodies have moved twice on this…
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation is common on treatment and is not pancreatitis. The distinction is clinical, not biochemical.