Every fortnight, every third week, seasonally: an unstudied practice
An absence of evidence is not evidence of harm. It is also not a licence.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Everything filed in June 2025, the month of Volume 2, Number 6. The issue itself — cover, editor’s letter and table of contents — is here.
An absence of evidence is not evidence of harm. It is also not a licence.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The ceiling varies severalfold between people, and nothing measurable at baseline predicts where it sits.
The header identifies the batch, the table records the tests, and the footer says who is answerable. Two of the three are usually incomplete.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Mass and function are different endpoints and training affects them differently. Most coverage treats them as one.
The insulin injection-technique literature is large, well conducted and directly transferable on questions of depth and tissue. We say where it stops transferring.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Dose reduction is not withdrawal, and the trials that tested withdrawal cannot be read as testing it.
What the pivotal programmes measured and how often, which is a more defensible template than most published monitoring schedules.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The evidence on stopping is better than the evidence on almost anything else in this field, because somebody deliberately randomised it.
Parts per million sound impressive until they are converted into daltons at the molecular weight of the thing being measured.
The four-week step exists because four to five weeks is approximately how long a once-weekly drug takes to stop rising at a fixed dose. That is a good reason, and it is not…
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
Almost every misreading of a laboratory panel is a misunderstanding of what a reference interval is and how much a result has to move before the movement means anything.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
The central effects are not a bonus. On the current evidence they are the principal mechanism of weight loss.
Every third-party report in this market describes a sample somebody chose to send. That choice is outside the laboratory’s control and outside its records.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A flag is a probability statement about a population. It is not a statement about the person holding the printout.