Sweden caps dulaglutide prescribing to 22 specialist centres
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 159 of 170 of this archive, newest first.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Almost nothing in the standard management repertoire has been tested in a randomised trial in this specific population. We say what is extrapolated and from where.
A substantial proportion of the abnormal results generated during rapid weight loss are consequences of the weight loss rather than findings about the person.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
Head-to-head data exists for some of these comparisons and not for others. This piece says which.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
Every degradation pathway accelerates by orders of magnitude on reconstitution, because the solvent that lyophilisation removed is the reagent most of them need.
Almost every misreading of a laboratory panel is a misunderstanding of what a reference interval is and how much a result has to move before the movement means anything.
A blank certificate with the numbers left editable is an ordinary internal document. Its circulation as a finished record is the problem.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The evidence base is one secondary analysis, several small studies and a large amount of extrapolation from bariatric surgery.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
What the regulatory dossiers actually contain on dose selection is remarkably thin, and worth knowing before treating the ladder as settled science.
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.