A supplier suspends shipping to Switzerland after 19 consecutive customs detentions
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Testing Dispatch
The Journal submitted the sample and paid for the analysis. The vendor was told in advance.
Medutest has published a purity determination of 96.7% on a 30 mg vial of tirzepatide supplied by GL Biochem, against a figure of 95.9% on the certificate that accompanied the vial. The sample was submitted by the Journal in April 2024 as part of a continuing programme of arm’s-length purchasing, and the vendor was told before the order was placed that any result would be published.
The Journal purchased 2300 vials from the same lot and had 8 of them analysed separately, in order to distinguish vial-to-vial variation from method variation. Vial-to-vial agreement was within 0.4 percentage points. Method-to-method disagreement was an order of magnitude larger.
Reported figures across the set were: highest 96.7%, lowest 95.9%, median close to the midpoint of the two. Every report in the set stated a detection wavelength, and 8 of them stated an integration threshold. The Journal has asked the laboratory to publish thresholds on all reports as a matter of routine.
Four independent services — Medutest, VendorInvestigate, and the two others operating in this market — carry the analytical burden for a trade that has no release-testing obligation of its own. Each is paid by whoever submits the sample, which is usually the vendor. The Journal’s position is that a submitter-pays model is workable but that its incentive structure has to be stated whenever a result is quoted as verification.
"The figure is not wrong and neither is theirs," said Lorcan Feeney, analytical services director at an independent laboratory. "They are answers to two different questions and the trade has decided to pretend there is only one question. Print the gradient and the argument disappears."
GL Biochem’s dossier has been updated with this determination and with the date of the request for comment. The dossier’s "what we could not verify" box records the questions still outstanding.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
The report states the gradient, the wavelength and the integration threshold, which is more than most.
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.
The Journal submitted the sample and paid for the analysis. The vendor was told in advance.