Independent analysis puts a QSC exenatide lot at 97.5%, against 96.7% on the certificate
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Testing Dispatch
The result is unremarkable. What the report omits is not.
PeptideMeter has released a batch of 9 analytical reports on research-grade exenatide lots, including material from SSA and MKM. Reported purities range across roughly 4.3 percentage points, and the report set is unusual in stating the analytical method for every determination rather than for some of them.
Content by elemental nitrogen determination returned 97% of the labelled nominal mass, which on a 2 mg vial corresponds to roughly 9.54 mg of peptide rather than the labelled figure. The remainder is accounted for by counter-ion, residual water and residual solvent, none of which is visible chromatographically.
The wider context is that material sold for research use carries no regulatory release specification in any jurisdiction the Journal has examined. A certificate is a commercial document, not a compliance one, and its content is whatever the issuer chooses to put on it. That is the gap independent testing fills, and it fills it imperfectly.
Sinéad Corrigan, patient advocate and former trial participant, was more cautious. "One lot tells you about one lot. I would not draw a conclusion about a company from a single determination, and I would not let a company draw one either."
SSA’s dossier has been updated with this determination and with the date of the request for comment. The dossier’s "what we could not verify" box records the questions still outstanding.
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.
A retest date says that material should be re-examined before use. An expiry date says it should not be used. The trade uses the second word for the first concept.
The condition on arrival is recorded by some services and not others, and it is one of the more informative lines in a report.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
The header identifies the batch, the table records the tests, and the footer says who is answerable. Two of the three are usually incomplete.
An in-use period is established by a dedicated study on a specific formulation in a specific container at a specific concentration. Borrowing one from a marketed product is…