Independent analysis puts a QSC exenatide lot at 97.5%, against 96.7% on the certificate
The supplier confirmed the determination and supplied the method behind its own figure inside a week.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Testing Dispatch
The result is unremarkable. What the report states alongside it is not.
PeptideMeter has released a batch of 8 analytical reports on research-grade exenatide lots, including material from HJ and Homopeptide. Reported purities range across roughly 3.5 percentage points, and the report set is unusual in stating the analytical method for every determination rather than for some of them.
Content by elemental nitrogen determination returned 98% of the labelled nominal mass, which on a 30 mg vial corresponds to roughly 7.70 mg of peptide rather than the labelled figure. The remainder is accounted for by counter-ion, residual water and residual solvent, none of which is visible chromatographically.
Purity became this trade’s single figure of merit because it is the cheapest measurement to obtain and the easiest to compare. Peptide content, which determines how much drug is actually in a vial, costs several times as much and is quoted as a priced addition by most of the twenty companies in the Journal’s dossier programme rather than carried as a standard release test. Sterility and endotoxin are separate disciplines again, and are neither tested nor claimed.
"Ask for the suitability summary before you argue about the percentage," said Dr Emiko Tanabe, mass spectrometrist. "If the tailing factor and the replicate precision are outside limits, you are arguing about arithmetic performed on an unfit separation."HJ’s dossier has been updated with this determination and with the company’s response to it. The dossier’s ordering box records the lead times, the minimum quantities and what a buyer should ask for at the point of order.
The supplier confirmed the determination and supplied the method behind its own figure inside a week.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
The report states the gradient, the wavelength and the integration threshold, which is more than most.
The result is unremarkable. What the report states alongside it is not.
Reversed-phase chromatography runs in an organic, acidic mobile phase that dissociates most non-covalent aggregates on the way to the detector.