Inspectors cite the relabeller trading as Vantris Bio over sterility assurance
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
The Ledger Dispatch
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Poland has declined to reimburse liraglutide in general practice, restricting supply to specialist weight-management services. The appraisal accepted the clinical evidence and turned instead on the cost-effectiveness of an indefinite treatment duration in a population the size of the eligible one.
The carve-out removes cover for approximately 14,000 covered lives with 25 days’ notice. Employees already in treatment are offered a transition period; those in the middle of a titration are not distinguished from those at maintenance dose, which the Journal has asked about.
The carve-out removes cover for approximately 14,000 covered lives with 25 days’ notice. Employees already in treatment are offered a transition period; those in the middle of a titration are not distinguished from those at maintenance dose, which the Journal has asked about.
The structural feature of this market is that the list price and the price actually paid are different numbers, and that the second is contractually confidential in most systems. Any comparison of what a drug costs across countries that relies on published prices is comparing publications. The Journal reports both where it can and says which is which.
Sinéad Corrigan, patient advocate and former trial participant, said the duration assumption was doing all the work. "Change the assumed treatment length and the recommendation flips. That is not a criticism of the model; it is what the model is for."
Readers whose employer has changed cover are asked to write to the letters desk. We do not publish employer names without documentation.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Cost is the modal reason for discontinuation in every dataset we have seen, and it is absent from the clinical literature.