The supply gap as a clinical event
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 2 of 25 of this archive, newest first.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
The evidence on stopping is better than the evidence on almost anything else in this field, because somebody deliberately randomised it.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
What the labels permit, what clinicians do, and the size of the gap between them.
Every step between the laboratory report and the product page removes information, and the badge is the last step.
Why the reason for stopping changes what happens afterwards.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Cost is the modal reason for discontinuation in every dataset we have seen, and it is absent from the clinical literature.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.