Twenty Vendors, Twenty Vials
The Journal buys one vial from each of the twenty companies whose names appear most often on the label, and submits every one to independent analysis.
A purchasing exercise conducted at arm’s length, with the orders placed as an ordinary customer, the samples split, and duplicates sent blind to more than one laboratory. We publish the purchase date, the price paid, the method used and the result — and we publish the disagreements between laboratories rather than averaging them away.
Instalments
12 of 12 plannedPart 1 — The Ledger
The submitted sample: the weakest link in the whole system
What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.
Sunniva Ørstavik
4 Jan 2024
1,687 words
Part 2 — Explainers
Why two wavelengths on one run would settle several arguments
Non-chromophoric components — counter-ions, salts, some excipients — contribute mass to the vial and nothing at all to the chromatogram.
Marguerite Vasseur
23 Mar 2024
3,040 words
Part 3 — Analytics
Three services, one lot, and a spread of two and a half points
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
Roshan Devakumar
3 Jun 2024
1,912 words
Part 4 — The Ledger
Six words a verification badge would need to mean anything
What a verification mark would have to carry to be checkable: a date, a lot, a method, a submitter and a link to the report.
Noor Haddadin
26 Aug 2024
1,995 words
Part 5 — The Ledger
Reproducibility, measured rather than assumed
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Noor Haddadin
10 Nov 2024
1,646 words
Part 6 — Analytics
Reproducibility, measured rather than assumed
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
Nikolaj Brandvold
7 Feb 2025
1,611 words
Part 7 — The Ledger
A tested vial is evidence about a vial
What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.
Noor Haddadin
20 Apr 2025
3,057 words
Part 8 — The Supply Chain
The submitted sample: the weakest link in the whole system
Every third-party report in this market describes a sample somebody chose to send. That choice is outside the laboratory’s control and outside its records.
Evander Sittig
19 Jun 2025
1,591 words
Part 9 — Explainers
Retention time is not identity
Matching a retention time against a standard is evidence of consistency, not proof of identity. Two different species can elute at the same time on one method.
Delphine Ruzek
2 Sep 2025
1,567 words
Part 10 — The Ledger
How a claim degrades between the bench and the listing
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Noor Haddadin
17 Nov 2025
1,979 words
Part 11 — Analytics
The badge economy, and what it is actually certifying
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Wren Kealoha
1 Feb 2026
1,542 words
Part 12 — The Supply Chain
Same material, different gradients, different answers
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Evander Sittig
15 Apr 2026
1,864 words