What changed at CPC in January, and what the company will not say about it
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 68 of 68 of this archive, newest first.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
We give background rates alongside trial rates, because an event occurring during treatment is not thereby caused by it.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.
Parts per million sound impressive until they are converted into daltons at the molecular weight of the thing being measured.
The Journal submitted the sample and paid for the analysis. The vendor was told in advance.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
Nothing on this page is difficult. It is simply unfamiliar, and unfamiliarity is what makes a weak certificate look like a strong one.
A unit is a volume. A dose is a mass. The bridge between them is concentration, and concentration is a number somebody has to calculate.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
A withdrawal trial answers a narrower question than it appears to. This piece states which question.
What would make a difference is not a regulator. It is three lines on a certificate, all of which are already known to whoever wrote it.
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The features that should prompt urgent assessment, stated once and plainly.
Almost every figure in circulation about tolerability comes from six publications. This is what they say.
A result on one vial generalises to a batch only if the vial was drawn in a way that makes it representative — and nobody records how it was drawn.
A reminder that a purity figure is the output of a method, and that methods differ.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.