The slide that was not in the abstract
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 11 of 68 of this archive, newest first.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
An in-use period is established by a dedicated study on a specific formulation in a specific container at a specific concentration. Borrowing one from a marketed product is…
The supplier confirmed the determination and supplied the method behind its own figure inside a week.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
The receptor populations that produce satiety and the ones that produce nausea overlap substantially. That is why the ceiling of this drug class is where it is, and it is…
We describe each pathway in enough chemical detail to explain why it is invisible to the method the trade uses, because that is the part which has practical consequences.
The compartment called lean mass contains water, glycogen, viscera and skin. Only some of it is the tissue anybody is worried about.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A pharmacist catches most of these in licensed practice. In this market there is no pharmacist, so the checks have to be structural.
An accumulation model, drawn from published parameters, with its assumptions stated.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Every certificate circulating in this market answers a question about molecules. Almost none answers a question about organisms, pyrogens, or the integrity of the seal.
The absence of microbiological capability in this market is a commercial fact with a straightforward explanation, and it is worth understanding before blaming anybody for it.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.