Tianjin export categories for peptide intermediates were quietly renamed
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Testing Dispatch
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.
A peptide content determination commissioned by the Journal on a 20 mg retatrutide vial from SSA has returned 87% of the labelled mass. Chromatographic purity on the same vial was above 95.4%. The two numbers measure different things and only one of them was on the certificate.
The Journal purchased 1300 vials from the same lot and had 24 of them analysed separately, in order to distinguish vial-to-vial variation from method variation. Vial-to-vial agreement was within 0.4 percentage points. Method-to-method disagreement was an order of magnitude larger.
Reported figures across the set were: highest 95.4%, lowest 93.5%, median close to the midpoint of the two. Every report in the set stated a detection wavelength, and 24 of them stated an integration threshold. The Journal has asked the laboratory to publish thresholds on all reports as a matter of routine.
Batch variance rather than vendor quality is the recurring finding of this programme. Across the 24 determinations the Journal has commissioned to date, within-vendor spread has been wider than between-vendor spread for two thirds of the companies tracked, which is an argument against rating any supplier on a single number.
"Content is the number that matters if you are doing arithmetic with a vial, and content is the number nobody sells," said Lorcan Feeney, analytical services director at an independent laboratory. "Purity is what you can afford. Content is what you need."
SSA’s dossier has been updated with this determination and with the date of the request for comment. The dossier’s "what we could not verify" box records the questions still outstanding.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The Journal submitted the sample and paid for the analysis. The vendor was told in advance.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The Journal submitted the sample and paid for the analysis. The vendor was told in advance.
A reminder that a purity figure is the output of a method, and that methods differ.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.