Deamidation, oxidation, and the two shifts worth memorising
What would be needed to catch each of these, and what it would cost.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Testing Dispatch
The Journal submitted the sample and paid for the analysis. The vendor was told in advance.
Janoshik has published a purity determination of 98.8% on a 15 mg vial of semaglutide supplied by WXT, against a figure of 95.3% on the certificate that accompanied the vial. The sample was submitted by the Journal in May 2024 as part of a continuing programme of arm’s-length purchasing, and the vendor was told before the order was placed that any result would be published.
The Journal purchased 3400 vials from the same lot and had 5 of them analysed separately, in order to distinguish vial-to-vial variation from method variation. Vial-to-vial agreement was within 0.4 percentage points. Method-to-method disagreement was an order of magnitude larger.
Discrepancies of one to two percentage points between a supplier’s figure and an independent determination are common and usually explicable: a faster gradient resolves fewer impurities, a higher integration threshold discards more small peaks, and a wider solvent-front exclusion window removes early-eluting fragments from the calculation altogether. None of that is misconduct. All of it is invisible unless the method is disclosed.
"The useful thing in that report is not the percentage, it is the system suitability data," said Lorcan Feeney, analytical services director at an independent laboratory. "It is the only part that tells you whether the percentage means anything."
WXT’s dossier has been updated with this determination and with the date of the request for comment. The dossier’s "what we could not verify" box records the questions still outstanding.
What would be needed to catch each of these, and what it would cost.
Every step between the laboratory report and the product page removes information, and the badge is the last step.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
The absences are not concealment. They are the form the trade settled on, and no buyer has ever objected.
A shallow gradient resolves impurities that a steep one runs into the parent peak. Both methods are legitimate; only one of them can see the small stuff.
The report states the gradient, the wavelength and the integration threshold, which is more than most.