Tolerability is the ceiling, and the ceiling is personal
Trial discontinuation figures are a floor, not an estimate: trial populations are supported in ways ordinary patients are not.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 7 of 13 of this archive, newest first.
Trial discontinuation figures are a floor, not an estimate: trial populations are supported in ways ordinary patients are not.
What the trials measured was continuation against withdrawal. What patients want to know is continuation at a lower dose, and that study has largely not been done.
Higher doses of these molecules have been studied. In general they produced modest additional efficacy and disproportionate additional symptom burden, which is why the…
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A plateau at an intermediate dose and a plateau at the maximum dose look identical from the outside and mean different things.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
What the published pharmacokinetics permit, what the labels state, and where the two diverge.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
An effect is dose-limiting when it prevents adequate intake, prevents normal activity, or produces a risk of its own. Discomfort alone is not the test.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
We set out the questions that distinguish a symptom to manage from a dose to change.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The glucagon arm raises energy expenditure and also raises hepatic glucose output. Balancing those is the whole engineering problem.
The mechanism is well described. The variance is not.
We give background rates alongside trial rates, because an event occurring during treatment is not thereby caused by it.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.