The advice is mostly reasonable. The certainty is not earned.
Grading six widely repeated claims against the studies actually behind them.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 5 of 11 of this archive, newest first.
Grading six widely repeated claims against the studies actually behind them.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Which markers are informative, which are confounded, and which move for reasons unrelated to nutrition.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Timing is the whole of the post-cessation panel: draw it too early and it measures the treatment period.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Grading six widely repeated claims against the studies actually behind them.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Reduced intake is a plausible mechanism for deficiency. Reduced absorption is not, and the two are conflated in most of the advice.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The gap between a defensible recommendation and a confident one is where most of the harm in this subject lives.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The gap between a defensible recommendation and a confident one is where most of the harm in this subject lives.
A survey of what the meta-analyses support, with the populations named.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.