What a split-sample exercise can establish, and what it cannot
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 2 of 11 of this archive, newest first.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
A result on one vial generalises to a batch only if the vial was drawn in a way that makes it representative — and nobody records how it was drawn.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A supply interruption is a discontinuation with no notice, no taper and no plan. That is a distinct clinical situation.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Cost is the modal reason for discontinuation in every dataset we have seen, and it is absent from the clinical literature.