Saudi Arabia caps tirzepatide prescribing to 13 specialist centres
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 2 of 10 of this archive, newest first.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
What the labels permit, what clinicians do, and the size of the gap between them.
A supply interruption is a discontinuation with no notice, no taper and no plan. That is a distinct clinical situation.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The evidence on stopping is better than the evidence on almost anything else in this field, because somebody deliberately randomised it.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.