The dose that got you here and the dose that keeps you here
A survey of the maintenance evidence, which is shorter than the survey of the withdrawal evidence.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 3 of 10 of this archive, newest first.
A survey of the maintenance evidence, which is shorter than the survey of the withdrawal evidence.
Dose reduction is not withdrawal, and the trials that tested withdrawal cannot be read as testing it.
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A withdrawal trial answers a narrower question than it appears to. This piece states which question.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The Journal does not treat a badge as evidence and states so wherever it reports one.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Chain of custody, in a regulated setting, begins at sampling. Here it begins when the package arrives.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Cost is the modal reason for discontinuation in every dataset we have seen, and it is absent from the clinical literature.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.