Eating enough protein on a suppressed appetite is an arithmetic problem before it is a nutritional one
The practical difficulty is not knowing the target. It is meeting it on an appetite that has been pharmacologically reduced by half.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 3 of 3 of this archive, newest first.
The practical difficulty is not knowing the target. It is meeting it on an appetite that has been pharmacologically reduced by half.
A body-composition report gives four decimal places and no confidence interval. That is the whole difficulty in one sentence.
Where the familiar figures come from, what populations they were measured in, and how far the extrapolation reaches.
The gap between a defensible recommendation and a confident one is where most of the harm in this subject lives.
What the Journal would want measured before treating this as settled in either direction.
The gap between a defensible recommendation and a confident one is where most of the harm in this subject lives.
Grading six widely repeated claims against the studies actually behind them.
The gap between a defensible recommendation and a confident one is where most of the harm in this subject lives.
A substudy powered to describe a mean is not a substudy powered to detect a clinically meaningful individual change.
The evidence base is one secondary analysis, several small studies and a large amount of extrapolation from bariatric surgery.
The composition data comes from imaging substudies enrolling a few score participants at selected sites. It is the best evidence available and it is thin.
The gap between a defensible recommendation and a confident one is where most of the harm in this subject lives.
Weight loss reduces bone mineral density at load-bearing sites. Whether that translates into fractures in this population is unmeasured.
A plausible mechanism, a measurable change, and no outcome data. This is what an open question looks like.