Retest date, expiry date, and the two conventions being confused
A document is only as good as the chain that connects it to the material, and most chains here are two or three links longer than the paperwork admits.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 6 of 17 of this archive, newest first.
A document is only as good as the chain that connects it to the material, and most chains here are two or three links longer than the paperwork admits.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
The header identifies the batch, the table records the tests, and the footer says who is answerable. Two of the three are usually incomplete.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
The Journal’s standing position: a mass that matches is necessary evidence of identity and nowhere near sufficient.
A document is only as good as the chain that connects it to the material, and most chains here are two or three links longer than the paperwork admits.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
A manufacturer’s certificate is a self-declaration. An accredited laboratory’s report is a third-party measurement. The trade prints both under one heading.
What the Journal asks for when it writes to a supplier about an identity claim, and how often it gets it.
A document is only as good as the chain that connects it to the material, and most chains here are two or three links longer than the paperwork admits.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.