From cell to clinic: where the extrapolation stops being safe
Receptor pharmacology is strong on average effects and almost silent on individual variation. That gap is where most reader questions live.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 2 of 4 of this archive, newest first.
Receptor pharmacology is strong on average effects and almost silent on individual variation. That gap is where most reader questions live.
The mechanism is well described. The variance is not.
What the in-vitro data supports, what it does not, and where the extrapolation to a person begins.
A tour of the tissues where the receptor is expressed, and what happens in each.
Receptor pharmacology is strong on average effects and almost silent on individual variation. That gap is where most reader questions live.
Head-to-head data exists for some of these comparisons and not for others. This piece says which.
Receptor pharmacology is strong on average effects and almost silent on individual variation. That gap is where most reader questions live.
The class is described as though every molecule in it did the same thing. At the receptor, they demonstrably do not.
The glucagon arm raises energy expenditure and also raises hepatic glucose output. Balancing those is the whole engineering problem.
What adding GIP activity does, on the current evidence, and what remains unresolved.
The receptor is expressed in more tissues than the popular account allows, and that is the whole story.
The glucagon arm raises energy expenditure and also raises hepatic glucose output. Balancing those is the whole engineering problem.
The mechanism is well described. The variance is not.
The mechanism is well described. The variance is not.
A catalogue of open questions, with an assessment of how likely each is to be resolved.
A tour of the tissues where the receptor is expressed, and what happens in each.
The same receptor population that produces the therapeutic effect produces the commonest adverse one.
An accumulation model, drawn from published parameters, with its assumptions stated.
A tour of the tissues where the receptor is expressed, and what happens in each.
The mechanism is well described. The variance is not.