Escalating onto a rising curve
We work the arithmetic out in full, because it is arithmetic and it is short.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 15 of 21 of this archive, newest first.
We work the arithmetic out in full, because it is arithmetic and it is short.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Almost nothing in the standard management repertoire has been tested in a randomised trial in this specific population. We say what is extrapolated and from where.
The evidence is real, modest, and mostly retrospective. The guidance is correspondingly cautious and has been revised toward individualisation.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A plateau at an intermediate dose and a plateau at the maximum dose look identical from the outside and mean different things.
The dose-response curve in this class flattens near its top. That has direct consequences for whether the final rung is worth climbing.
Trial adverse-event tables count episodes reported to a study nurse. They are the best data we have and they systematically under-record the mundane.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Pancreatitis is rare, was adjudicated in the outcome programmes, and did not show the imbalance early case reports suggested.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Reducing a dose is not going backwards. In a tolerability-limited class it is the mechanism by which the ceiling is found.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
An effect is dose-limiting when it prevents adequate intake, prevents normal activity, or produces a risk of its own. Discomfort alone is not the test.
The receptor populations that produce satiety and the ones that produce nausea overlap substantially. That is why the ceiling of this drug class is where it is, and it is…
The clinical effect profile is almost fully predictable from where the receptor is expressed, which is unusual and useful.
Nausea and gastric delay attenuate over weeks at an unchanged dose. That single physiological fact is the entire justification for holding.
Where the curve flattens, what flattens with it, and what does not.
A single drug producing both constipation and diarrhoea looks contradictory until the motility data is read properly.