Discontinuation rates, read honestly
Roughly four to seven per cent of trial participants discontinued for adverse events, mostly gastrointestinal, mostly during escalation. That is the empirical size of the…
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 10 of 14 of this archive, newest first.
Roughly four to seven per cent of trial participants discontinued for adverse events, mostly gastrointestinal, mostly during escalation. That is the empirical size of the…
Cost is the modal reason for discontinuation in every dataset we have seen, and it is absent from the clinical literature.
The commonest real-world strategy in this drug class is the least studied one.
A survey of the maintenance evidence, which is shorter than the survey of the withdrawal evidence.
Holding a dose before a procedure has a kinetic problem: a weekly drug with a seven-day half-life cannot be cleared by skipping one injection.
Trial discontinuation figures are a floor, not an estimate: trial populations are supported in ways ordinary patients are not.
We work the arithmetic out in full, because it is arithmetic and it is short.
Almost nothing in the standard management repertoire has been tested in a randomised trial in this specific population. We say what is extrapolated and from where.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
What was withdrawn, from whom, after how long, and what was measured afterwards.
A plateau at an intermediate dose and a plateau at the maximum dose look identical from the outside and mean different things.
The dose-response curve in this class flattens near its top. That has direct consequences for whether the final rung is worth climbing.
The dose-response curve in this class flattens near its top. That has direct consequences for whether the final rung is worth climbing.
The intervention with the clearest evidence is the one nobody frames as an intervention: adjusting the dose.
Dose reduction is not withdrawal, and the trials that tested withdrawal cannot be read as testing it.
A survey of the maintenance evidence, which is shorter than the survey of the withdrawal evidence.
Delayed gastric emptying is a mechanism that becomes an adverse effect above a threshold. It is not a complication in the ordinary sense.
An effect is dose-limiting when it prevents adequate intake, prevents normal activity, or produces a risk of its own. Discomfort alone is not the test.
A survey of the maintenance evidence, which is shorter than the survey of the withdrawal evidence.
Dose reduction is not withdrawal, and the trials that tested withdrawal cannot be read as testing it.