Portugal declines to reimburse liraglutide outside a specialist service
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 5 of 5 of this archive, newest first.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Every certificate circulating in this market answers a question about molecules. Almost none answers a question about organisms, pyrogens, or the integrity of the seal.
A result on one vial generalises to a batch only if the vial was drawn in a way that makes it representative — and nobody records how it was drawn.
A survey of the maintenance evidence, which is shorter than the survey of the withdrawal evidence.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.