Electrospray, MALDI, and the choice that shapes every spectrum after it
The two ionisation techniques in general use produce different charge distributions, different adducts and different failure modes. Certificates almost never say which was…
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Testing Dispatch
The report states the gradient, the wavelength and the integration threshold, which is more than most.
PeptideMeter has released a batch of 17 analytical reports on research-grade dulaglutide lots, including material from FGP and TFC. Reported purities range across roughly 2.2 percentage points, and the report set is unusual in stating the analytical method for every determination rather than for some of them.
Reported figures across the set were: highest 96.6%, lowest 94.9%, median close to the midpoint of the two. Every report in the set stated a detection wavelength, and 17 of them stated an integration threshold. The Journal has asked the laboratory to publish thresholds on all reports as a matter of routine.
Reported figures across the set were: highest 96.6%, lowest 94.9%, median close to the midpoint of the two. Every report in the set stated a detection wavelength, and 17 of them stated an integration threshold. The Journal has asked the laboratory to publish thresholds on all reports as a matter of routine.
The wider context is that material sold for research use carries no regulatory release specification in any jurisdiction the Journal has examined. A certificate is a commercial document, not a compliance one, and its content is whatever the issuer chooses to put on it. That is the gap independent testing fills, and it fills it imperfectly.
Alastair Renshaw, pharmaceutical supply-chain consultant, said the gap was predictable from the methods alone. "You can reconstruct almost the whole difference from the integration threshold. What you cannot reconstruct is why anyone thinks a number without a threshold is comparable to a number with one."
FGP’s dossier has been updated with this determination and with the date of the request for comment. The dossier’s "what we could not verify" box records the questions still outstanding.
The two ionisation techniques in general use produce different charge distributions, different adducts and different failure modes. Certificates almost never say which was…
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
The Journal has read several hundred certificates from twenty companies. The number is almost always there; the method behind it almost never is.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
What would make a difference is not a regulator. It is three lines on a certificate, all of which are already known to whoever wrote it.
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.