A missed dose, modelled: what happens to liraglutide concentrations over the following fortnight
Half-life, accumulation ratio and time to steady state are three separate quantities, and confusing them produces most of the bad advice in circulation.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 26 of 31 of this archive, newest first.
Half-life, accumulation ratio and time to steady state are three separate quantities, and confusing them produces most of the bad advice in circulation.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
What the pharmacokinetic data supports about dose timing, missed doses and interruption.
Nausea and gastric delay attenuate over weeks at an unchanged dose. That single physiological fact is the entire justification for holding.
Supply interruption is the commonest cause of unplanned re-titration in this market, and it is almost never framed that way.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Pancreatitis is rare, was adjudicated in the outcome programmes, and did not show the imbalance early case reports suggested.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The clinical effect profile is almost fully predictable from where the receptor is expressed, which is unusual and useful.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
We have catalogued what readers report, ranked by the size of the dosing error each produces.
We give background rates alongside trial rates, because an event occurring during treatment is not thereby caused by it.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The features that should prompt urgent assessment, stated once and plainly.
Reducing a dose is not going backwards. In a tolerability-limited class it is the mechanism by which the ceiling is found.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
We give background rates alongside trial rates, because an event occurring during treatment is not thereby caused by it.
The evidence is real, modest, and mostly retrospective. The guidance is correspondingly cautious and has been revised toward individualisation.
What the in-vitro data supports, what it does not, and where the extrapolation to a person begins.
Where the curve flattens, what flattens with it, and what does not.