What the new Singapore guidance says about stopping
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 24 of 31 of this archive, newest first.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Pancreatitis is rare, was adjudicated in the outcome programmes, and did not show the imbalance early case reports suggested.
A survey of the maintenance evidence, which is shorter than the survey of the withdrawal evidence.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The most dangerous errors are the ones that leave no trace: nothing looks wrong, the mark is in the same place, and the dose is wrong by an order of magnitude.
Delayed gastric emptying is a mechanism that becomes an adverse effect above a threshold. It is not a complication in the ordinary sense.
The class is described as though every molecule in it did the same thing. At the receptor, they demonstrably do not.
An effect is dose-limiting when it prevents adequate intake, prevents normal activity, or produces a risk of its own. Discomfort alone is not the test.
The clinical effect profile is almost fully predictable from where the receptor is expressed, which is unusual and useful.
The mechanism is well described. The variance is not.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Nausea and gastric delay attenuate over weeks at an unchanged dose. That single physiological fact is the entire justification for holding.
What the trials measured was continuation against withdrawal. What patients want to know is continuation at a lower dose, and that study has largely not been done.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Nausea and gastric delay attenuate over weeks at an unchanged dose. That single physiological fact is the entire justification for holding.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
A rotation scheme that is too complicated will not be followed. We describe the simple ones that are.
The intervention with the clearest evidence is the one nobody frames as an intervention: adjusting the dose.