Vitamin D, adiposity, and a volume-of-distribution problem
Reduced intake is a plausible mechanism for deficiency. Reduced absorption is not, and the two are conflated in most of the advice.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Hepatic steatosis, transaminases, and the MASH trial programme.
Reduced intake is a plausible mechanism for deficiency. Reduced absorption is not, and the two are conflated in most of the advice.
The alternatives with shorter windows, what they measure, and why they are rarely ordered.
A substantial proportion of the abnormal results generated during rapid weight loss are consequences of the weight loss rather than findings about the person.
The argument for a baseline panel is that it makes every subsequent result interpretable. The argument against frequent monitoring is that noise accumulates faster than…
What the pivotal programmes measured and how often, which is a more defensible template than most published monitoring schedules.
What the trials measured, which in the case of micronutrients is very little.
What the renal and hepatic outcome programmes actually measured, and over what duration.
The argument for a baseline panel is that it makes every subsequent result interpretable. The argument against frequent monitoring is that noise accumulates faster than…
Micronutrient guidance for this drug class is borrowed almost entirely from post-bariatric surveillance, where the anatomy is different and the deficiency mechanisms are not…
A substantial proportion of the abnormal results generated during rapid weight loss are consequences of the weight loss rather than findings about the person.
What the pivotal programmes measured and how often, which is a more defensible template than most published monitoring schedules.
Reduced intake is a plausible mechanism for deficiency. Reduced absorption is not, and the two are conflated in most of the advice.
Three different explanations for the same abnormal number, and how to tell them apart.
A monitoring schedule requires evidence about incidence. For this population, that evidence does not exist.
The estimated glomerular filtration rate is calculated from creatinine, creatinine comes from muscle, and muscle mass is falling. The arithmetic is unforgiving.
Three different explanations for the same abnormal number, and how to tell them apart.
Asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation is common on treatment and is not pancreatitis. The distinction is clinical, not biochemical.
What the trials measured, which in the case of micronutrients is very little.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate is a calculation with muscle mass in the denominator of its assumptions. In this population that matters.
Timing is the whole of the post-cessation panel: draw it too early and it measures the treatment period.