Diminishing returns, quantified
The ceiling in this class is anatomical: the same receptor populations that suppress appetite provoke nausea, and they saturate together.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 4 of 18 of this archive, newest first.
The ceiling in this class is anatomical: the same receptor populations that suppress appetite provoke nausea, and they saturate together.
What the pharmacokinetic data supports about dose timing, missed doses and interruption.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
HbA1c integrates roughly three months of glycaemia with the most recent weeks weighted most heavily. Almost every misreading of it is a misreading of that weighting.
We looked at what the dose-ranging data supports about going higher, and it is thinner and less flattering than the market assumes.
A tour of what happens in the thirty seconds after binding, and why it matters at week thirty.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
Mass and function are different endpoints and training affects them differently. Most coverage treats them as one.
A dose held long enough stops being a pause and becomes a maintenance decision. That transition is rarely made explicitly.
Where the curve flattens, what flattens with it, and what does not.
The published ladder exists because a protocol needed a single number. Practice has never followed it exactly, and the regulatory file never assumed it would.
A dual agonist is one molecule with two receptor activities. A co-formulation is two molecules in one pen. The coverage treats them as synonyms.
A supply interruption is a discontinuation with no notice, no taper and no plan. That is a distinct clinical situation.
A supply interruption is a discontinuation with no notice, no taper and no plan. That is a distinct clinical situation.
The four-week step exists because four to five weeks is approximately how long a once-weekly drug takes to stop rising at a fixed dose. That is a good reason, and it is not…
The convention — resume lower, re-escalate — is not caution. It follows directly from the elimination half-life.
Density is a proxy for strength and an imperfect one, particularly when soft-tissue thickness over the measurement site is changing.
What was withdrawn, from whom, after how long, and what was measured afterwards.
We work the arithmetic out in full, because it is arithmetic and it is short.
What the trials measured, which in the case of micronutrients is very little.