STEP 5 misses on a secondary endpoint the coverage has not mentioned
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 53 of 68 of this archive, newest first.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A brief and unromantic tour of the interface between a liquid sample and a vacuum.
The features that should prompt urgent assessment, stated once and plainly.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Non-chromophoric components — counter-ions, salts, some excipients — contribute mass to the vial and nothing at all to the chromatogram.
Asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation is common on treatment and is not pancreatitis. The distinction is clinical, not biochemical.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
The ceiling in this class is anatomical: the same receptor populations that suppress appetite provoke nausea, and they saturate together.
What the Journal asks when a document arrives unsigned, and what the answers have been.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Almost every case involves a change — a new vial, a new syringe size, a new supplier — carried forward with an old number.
HbA1c integrates roughly three months of glycaemia with the most recent weeks weighted most heavily. Almost every misreading of it is a misreading of that weighting.
The header identifies the batch, the table records the tests, and the footer says who is answerable. Two of the three are usually incomplete.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
A survey of the maintenance evidence, which is shorter than the survey of the withdrawal evidence.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.