What the trials counted as intolerance
Trial discontinuation figures are a floor, not an estimate: trial populations are supported in ways ordinary patients are not.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 12 of 31 of this archive, newest first.
Trial discontinuation figures are a floor, not an estimate: trial populations are supported in ways ordinary patients are not.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The class is described as though every molecule in it did the same thing. At the receptor, they demonstrably do not.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A survey of the maintenance evidence, which is shorter than the survey of the withdrawal evidence.
The receptor is expressed in more tissues than the popular account allows, and that is the whole story.
Cost is the modal reason for discontinuation in every dataset we have seen, and it is absent from the clinical literature.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
For licensed products the in-use period is established by stability data. For a peptide reconstituted at home there is no such data, and the honest answer is that nobody…
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Higher doses of these molecules have been studied. In general they produced modest additional efficacy and disproportionate additional symptom burden, which is why the…
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
What the published pharmacokinetics permit, what the labels state, and where the two diverge.
The glucagon arm raises energy expenditure and also raises hepatic glucose output. Balancing those is the whole engineering problem.
One omitted dose is a labelling question. Four omitted doses is a clinical one. The two are routinely conflated.
What the trials measured was continuation against withdrawal. What patients want to know is continuation at a lower dose, and that study has largely not been done.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
What the published pharmacokinetics permit, what the labels state, and where the two diverge.