Six words a verification badge would need to mean anything
Lot-level verification with a public report is a real and achievable thing. It exists in this market, on a minority of listings.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 3 of 6 of this archive, newest first.
Lot-level verification with a public report is a real and achievable thing. It exists in this market, on a minority of listings.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
Every step between the laboratory report and the product page removes information, and the badge is the last step.
The condition on arrival is recorded by some services and not others, and it is one of the more informative lines in a report.
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
The Journal does not treat a badge as evidence and states so wherever it reports one.
A result on one vial generalises to a batch only if the vial was drawn in a way that makes it representative — and nobody records how it was drawn.
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Every step between the laboratory report and the product page removes information, and the badge is the last step.
What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.
Lot-level verification with a public report is a real and achievable thing. It exists in this market, on a minority of listings.
Lot-level verification with a public report is a real and achievable thing. It exists in this market, on a minority of listings.
What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
The Journal does not treat a badge as evidence and states so wherever it reports one.
Every step between the laboratory report and the product page removes information, and the badge is the last step.
The condition on arrival is recorded by some services and not others, and it is one of the more informative lines in a report.
What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.